A European dimension to the training of employee board-level representatives (752.26)

30 May – 01 June 2007   Elewijt Center (Belgium)

This event had the support of the EUROPEAN UNION

 The participants   

Seminar documents

 

     

The contents of the workshop

The Education Department of the European Trade Union Institute for Research, Education and Health and Safety organised a workshop about A European dimension to the training of employee board-level representatives at the Elewijt Center nearby Brussels 30th May – 1st June 2007. This workshop gathered trade union representatives and trainers from Austria, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Ireland, the Slovak Republic, Sweden as well as a number of experts. 

The aims were:

bullet

To analyse the role and function of workers’ representatives at company board level in an European perspective

bullet

To compare training possibilities for those board representatives

bullet

To set up a network between institutes proposing training activities for those board representatives.

 

According to the character of this seminar, the participants introduced each other in a game that gave the opportunity to exchange of basic personal and professional information including participants’ expectations towards the seminar.    

 

First presenters, Michael Stollt and Norbert Kluge from ETUI – REHS gave a brief overview on board level representation in Europe and explained the differences between national representation systems. (The documents presented at the workshop can be downloaded from the Seminar documents section of this Web Site.)

 

Later during the day each of the representatives of different countries held a presentation on specific trade union programs and changing needs and demands to trade unions on national level. (All presentations are available from the Seminar documents section)

 

Some of the emphasized issues and problematic points:

 

bullet

Austria: Trade unions organize people for the training courses and due to their efforts those are fully booked and trainers at their limit of capacity.

 

bullet

Norway: bigger unions can focus and take care of trainings but smaller ones do not have the capacity.

 

bullet

Denmark: trainings are offered in vary issues (business, economy, legal advice etc).

 

bullet

Finland: the main problem that courses are offered for board level representatives but they are not interested.

 

bullet

Slovakia: In case of Slovnaft (Slovakian oil and gas company), trainings paid by the company, no problem with it but there are other questioned issues.

 

bullet

Sweden: there is education but the costs are high.

 

bullet

Ireland: high demand for training, EBL’s often not aware of European issues.

 

In summary, with some exceptions, an offer for education exists and board level representatives are one of the main target groups for training activities at national level, however European issues are not in the main focus yet, law, accountancy etc are the most common themes proposed during those courses.

 

During those exchanges the following needs were identified:

 

bullet

National systems (clarifying the differences between national systems and role of BLRs)

bullet

Statistics (eg: approximately how many BLRs are in the country?, what is the percentage of trained?)

bullet

Financial background (eg: are the BLRs paid in general? Can they keep the money? Who pays for the training?)

bullet

Practical questions: language matters (eg: are there courses offered in English? Is there translation?), recruiting (eg. Who get the people for courses?)

The objective of the second day was to identify topics characterized by a transnational dimension on the basis of an exchange with BLRs and the national training experiences. As a warming up, participants read and discussed a short story about a difficult situation and as it was expected from the different groups to come to diverging conclusions. It showed well what kind of problems trainers will have to face on European level.

 

Practitioners from Finland, Germany and France explained their experiences on transnational dimensions of their worker representative role.

 

Rauni Söderlund (former member of the board of Nordea Bank) reported that there was no much training on board level and answered to the audience’ questions concerning the differences between Swedish and Finnish national representation systems, negotiation, remuneration and practical difficulties of preparing for board meetings.   

 

Peter Zettl (member of SE works council of MAN Diesel SE) gave a summary on what sort of problems arised while setting up the SE, and answered questions regarding the negotiation process.

 

Jean – Michel Gaveau (member of the administrative board of France Telecom, CGT) provided details on the company, and mentioned that cutting R&D costs affects trainings too, and emphasized that national capacities are limited.  

 

As closing down the session, Kevin O’Kelly presented results of a 9-country survey’s on EBLs training that gave overview on facts and needs.

 

In the afternoon two mixed working groups were formed where the participants exchanged about:

 

bullet

Identification of suitable topics for a transnational training

bullet

Identification of suitable target groups

bullet

Reflection on appropriate formats of further supportive measures

bullet

Ideas on concrete projects

 

 The results briefly are as follows:

 

Working group I: (pps file can be downloaded from the Seminar document section).

 

  1. There must be joint presence of BLR’s in Europe (network, meetings etc)

  2. Qualification needed of BLR’s on European issues (basic training, interactive and distance learning, website etc.)

  3. Home-based training sessions (topics as globalization, restructuring, business english course, cross-cultural training, sector-based sessions, in-company training)

  4. Target groups: representatives with cross-boarder background (SE) and those who have training already on national level

 

Working group II.

 

The group identified 6 fields of training:

 

bullet

Development of legislation – corporate governance law

bullet

Confidentiality issues (company issue versa international issues)

bullet

Rule of BLR’s (including keeping eyes on developments)

bullet

Link between the different level of representations

bullet

Overview on different national systems

bullet

Private equity-finance-pension funds issues

 

The main point is to gain understanding among employee representatives for what is going on in the business world and how to cope with the changes.

 

The following target groups for training on board level issues were mentioned: trainers, EWC coordinators, representatives in European Works Councils, board level representatives 

 

The third day the outcomes of the working group discussion were presented in  plenary and during a tour de table Rainer Hoffmann, Deputy General Secretary, ETUC, Reinhard Reibsch General Secretary, EMCEF, Simon Cox, EFFAT, Luc Triangle representing EMF and Reiner Koch representing EPSU shared their points of view. Emphasize was given for issues as networking, solidarity. Common positions need to not only to be developed but also to be implemented into practice.

 

Finally Norbert Kluge in his conclusions proposed the following next steps:

 

bullet

Treating BLRs as leaders similarly to business world (organizing a seminar-showing a kind of presence to EU decision makers)

bullet

Proper “Train the trainer” course

bullet

Collaboration between branches and sectors

bullet

To make BLRs sensitive towards European issues on national level

bullet

Website services, exchange programs would help understanding

 

Some participants added that:

 

bullet

Basic trainings is needed

bullet

Experts who could be available and support workers' representatives at board level need to be identified

bullet

Workers' reps at board level have to be familiarised with differences in national representation systems.

 

 

Useful links:

 

www.worker-representation.eu

www.etui-rehs.org

www.etuc.org

www.boeckler.org

www.effat.org

www.emcef.org

www.emf.org

www.epsu.org

 

http://www.worker-participation.eu/european_works_councils/ewc_training

 
       

 

 This site was last updated 07/18/07